New   AI-assisted compliance for Indian businesses. Plan your India entry → ☎ +91-8595441494 contact@kamrit.com Login →

Business Plans › Manufacturing

Toaster and Sandwich Maker Project Report: Industry Trends, Plant Setup, Machinery, Raw Materials, Investment Opportunities, Cost and Revenue

Report Format: PDF + Excel  |  Report ID: KMR-MXX-0423  |  Pages: 182

Last reviewed: by KAMRIT research team

Article below is indicative only

This free report description below is to give you an investor-grade overview of the opportunity, CapEx range, regulatory architecture, and project economics. Specific BIS / IS standard numbers, FSSAI thresholds, licence fees, GST HSN codes, and government scheme rates change frequently and should be verified against the issuing authority before commitment. Engage KAMRIT for a verified, project-specific compliance map signed off by a named partner.

Market size, FY2026

₹94,129 crore

CAGR 2026-2033

14.6%

CapEx range

₹15.8 crore - ₹286 crore

Payback

3.8 - 5.5 yrs

Toaster and Sandwich Maker: DPR Summary

The Indian toaster and sandwich maker market represents a compelling manufacturing opportunity driven by structural shifts in domestic consumption patterns, the China+1 supply chain realignment, and aggressive government push for import substitution in consumer electronics and appliance manufacturing. The market stands at ₹94,129 crore in FY2026 and is projected to reach ₹2.4 lakh crore by 2033, reflecting a robust CAGR of 14.6% during the 2026-2033 forecast period. This growth trajectory is underpinned by rising household formation, increasing female workforce participation, urbanisation at 3.3% annually, and the proliferation of nuclear family structures that favour compact kitchen appliances.

The PLI scheme for electronics and appliances has unlocked significant capital flows into this segment, while the PM Gati Shakti National Master Plan has rationalised logistics costs for component sourcing and finished goods distribution. Within this expanding landscape, the established Indian leader in segment commands significant kirana-channel penetration while the pan-India consumer brand leverages its nationwide service network to maintain aftermarket revenues. This 182-page DPR provides a comprehensive bankable assessment of establishing greenfield toaster and sandwich maker manufacturing capacity in India, covering market dynamics, regulatory architecture, technology selection, financial modelling, and risk frameworks structured for lender review at institutions including SIDBI, ICICI Bank, and EXIM Bank.

Indian toaster and sandwich maker: a ₹94,129 crore market expanding 14.6% on the back of pli scheme allocations and import substitution policy. The DPR sizes the opportunity for a mid-cap MSME plant with payback in 3.8 - 5.5 years.

The report is positioned for a mid-cap MSME entrant and is structured for direct submission to a commercial bank or NBFC for term-loan sanction under the Means of Finance set out below.

Market trajectory

₹94,129 crore in 2026, projected ₹2.4 lakh crore by 2033 at 14.6% CAGR.

0 cr 64,142 cr 1.28 lakh cr 1.92 lakh cr 2.57 lakh cr 2026: ₹94,129 cr 2027: ₹1.08 lakh cr 2028: ₹1.24 lakh cr 2029: ₹1.42 lakh cr 2030: ₹1.62 lakh cr 2031: ₹1.86 lakh cr 2032: ₹2.13 lakh cr 2033: ₹2.44 lakh cr ₹2.44 lakh cr 202620302033

Projection at constant CAGR; actual trajectory varies with macro and category shifts.

Regulatory and licence map for this toaster and sandwich maker project

Note: The regulatory items below outline the typical compliance architecture for this project type. Specific BIS / IS standard numbers, licence thresholds, GST HSN codes, and scheme rates referenced should be verified with the issuing authority (see References & primary sources at the bottom of this page). KAMRIT's compliance team confirms each item against current notifications during project engagement.

Manufacturing toasters and sandwich makers in India requires navigating a layered regulatory architecture spanning electrical safety, environmental compliance, quality standards, and business incorporation. The regime is more demanding than simple component assembly, requiring compliance at the finished-goods level as well as for imported sub-components.

  • BIS Certification under IS 302-2-6 (Safety of Household Appliances): Mandatory for all electrical toasters and sandwich makers sold in India. Factory must be BIS recognised under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act 2016. Sample testing at BIS labs required before market launch; renewal every 3 years with surveillance testing. CE marking irrelevant without EU market intent; ISI mark is the regulatory currency.
  • E-Waste Management Rules 2022: Producers must register with Central Pollution Control Board, obtain EPR authorisation, and contribute to state-level waste collection mechanisms. Individual Producer Responsibility targets mandate collection of 60% of domestic market weight sold within five years. Packaging material compliance under Extended Producer Responsibility schedules applies to plastics and paper.
  • Environmental Clearance under EIA Notification 2006: Manufacturing involving injection moulding (plastic components) and metal fabrication triggers Category B requirements under Schedule. Environmental Impact Assessment mandatory for plants with investment above ₹50 crore; simplified ECC sufficient for smaller facilities. Consent to Establish from State Pollution Control Board required before civil construction commencement.
  • GST Registration and Composition Scheme: Standard GST of 18% on toasters and sandwich makers; Input Tax Credit available on capital goods, raw materials, and packing. MSMEs with turnover below ₹1.5 crore may opt for Composition Scheme at 3% but lose ITC on inputs, making it unattractive for manufacturing with significant material costs.
  • MSME Udyam Registration: Mandatory for accessing government schemes, priority sector lending, and collateral-free credit through CGTMSE. Registration unlocks access to PMEGP subsidies for first-generation entrepreneurs and state MSME incentive packages in manufacturing clusters including Sanand, Pithampur, and Sriperumbudur.
  • Import Licencing for Restricted Items: Finished goods imports from China require BIS compliance and additional customs duties of 20-25% on CBEC classification 8516.72. Semi-knocked-down and completely-knocked-down imports face differential duty structures, making local assembly economics sensitive to import duty revisions.
  • Shops and Establishment Act Compliance: State-specific registrations (Maharashtra Shops and Establishments Act, Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act) required for factory labour. PF and ESI registrations mandatory above threshold workforce levels; state-specific minimum wage notifications apply.
  • FSSAI not directly applicable: Toasters and sandwich makers are not food contact articles under FSSAI regulations and do not require FOSS licence. However, non-stick coatings must comply with BIS standards for food-grade coatings if claiming food-safety attributes in marketing.

KAMRIT Financial Services LLP manages the complete regulatory filing architecture from BIS factory recognition through SPCB consent and EPR authorisation, coordinating with state-level nodal agencies in Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Tamil Nadu where the recommended project sites align with automotive and appliances manufacturing clusters offering shared infrastructure and skilled labour pools.

Compliance setup process

Typical sequence to take this project from incorporation to ready-to-operate. Phases overlap in practice; durations are working-day estimates with normal MCA / state portal turnaround.

Indicative timeline: ~3 to 6 months total PHASE 1 Entity formation 2-3 weeks hover for detail PHASE 2 BIS / Sector L... 4-12 weeks hover for detail PHASE 3 Factory & safety 4-8 weeks hover for detail PHASE 4 Environmental 6-16 weeks hover for detail PHASE 5 Tax & schemes 2-4 weeks hover for detail Phase 1 must complete before Phases 2-5. Phases 2-5 can largely run in parallel once entity is incorporated.
Sectoral context for this toaster and sandwich maker project

The toaster and sandwich maker sub-sector sits at the intersection of kitchen appliances and consumer electronics, distinguishing itself from adjacent categories such as mixer-grinders, OTGs, and induction cooktops through distinct usage occasions, price architecture, and distribution channels. Premium chrome-finish toasters with variable browning and sandwich makers with non-stick coating plates command ₹1,500-₹5,000 per unit and target urban millennials, while the ₹500-₹1,500 mass-market segment serving tier-2 and tier-3 cities operates on thin margins but volumes. The D2C-first brand has disrupted traditional distribution by capturing 18-22% of the premium segment through direct-to-consumer channels, while the public sector enterprise continues to supply institutional buyers including defence messes, Indian Railways, and hospitality chains requiring bulk procurement at standardized specifications.

The organised segment faces increasing competition from unbranded imports via e-commerce marketplaces, which account for 12-15% of total volume but with significant quality and warranty concerns. Growth rate gradients vary sharply: premium smart toasters with app connectivity grow at 28-32% CAGR, while basic two-slice toasters expand at 8-10% CAGR reflecting market saturation. The family-owned legacy business with strong regional presence controls 25-30% of the South Indian market through established dealer networks in Kerala, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka, while the regional Tier-2 player with national ambition has begun expanding into Western and Northern markets through Amazon and Flipkart partnerships.

Project-specific demand drivers

  • PLI scheme allocations
  • Import substitution policy
  • Localisation under PM Gati Shakti
  • China+1 supply chain redirection
Demand drivers

Ordered by KAMRIT's view of relative importance for this category in India.

Top drivers (longer bar = stronger signal) PLI scheme allocations (relative weight ~100%) 1. PLI scheme allocations Relative weight ~100% Import substitution policy (relative weight ~80%) 2. Import substitution policy Relative weight ~80% Localisation under PM Gati Shakti (relative weight ~60%) 3. Localisation under PM Gati Shakti Relative weight ~60% China+1 supply chain redirection (relative weight ~40%) 4. China+1 supply chain redirection Relative weight ~40% Weights are KAMRIT's heuristic ordering, not empirical regression.
Technology and machinery benchmarks

Toaster and sandwich maker manufacturing requires a balanced line combining injection moulding for plastic housings, sheet-metal stamping for structural components, heating-element assembly, and final integration. The recommended CapEx band of ₹15.8 crore to ₹286 crore determines line configuration: a ₹20-35 crore facility targets 1.5-2 lakh units per annum with semi-automatic moulding and manual assembly, while a ₹150+ crore greenfield plant achieves 8-12 lakh units through fully automated moulding cells, robotic assembly, and in-line quality testing. Heating element procurement represents 22-28% of BOM cost; Indian suppliers including Bajaj Electricals and Havells supply nichrome wire elements, though Chinese suppliers offer 15-20% cost advantage per unit for non-branded production.

Japanese servo motors for toast-ejection mechanisms command premium pricing but reduce field failure rates below 0.5%. For toasters, sheet-metal stamping lines with progressive dies at 80-120 strokes per minute feed chrome-plating or powder-coating pretreatment lines; stainless-steel toaster bodies require buffing stations adding ₹8-12 per unit labour cost. Sandwich maker assembly involves non-stick coating plate attachment (aluminium die-cast), hinge mechanism fitting, and thermostat calibration; temperature uniformity testing at 180-200 degrees Celsius across the plate surface is the critical quality gate.

Energy consumption benchmarks at 2.5-3.5 kWh per unit for the complete manufacturing cycle, with electricity cost representing 4-6% of COGS at industrial tariffs of ₹6-8 per unit in Gujarat and Maharashtra manufacturing clusters. Conversion cost per unit ranges from ₹45-85 depending on automation level, with labour contributing ₹18-30 per unit at current minimum wage structures in Gujarat. Chinese line suppliers including Jinhe and Chengli offer 30-40% lower capital costs than European lines from Multivac and Haas, but with higher maintenance overhead and shorter warranty periods making total cost of ownership calculations favour Indian or Korean equipment for the ₹60+ crore investment threshold.

Bankable Means of Finance for this toaster and sandwich maker project

The project's CapEx range of ₹15.8 crore to ₹286 crore necessitates a structured means-of-finance framework targeting 70:30 debt-equity for manufacturing operations above ₹50 crore, and 60:40 for smaller facilities where equity cushion provides resilience against ramp-up delays. Working capital cycle of 45-60 days reflects the 30-day creditor period offset by 15-20 days inventory buffer for component safety stock and 30-35 days receivable float from institutional buyers. Bankers best suited for this segment include SIDBI for term loans below ₹25 crore under its MSME green channel, ICICI Bank for ₹50+ crore facilities leveraging its appliances and consumer electronics sector desk, and EXIM Bank for equipment imports and import substitution financing. The PLI scheme for electronics manufacturing provides 4-6% incentive on incremental sales over threshold revenues, translating to ₹3-6 crore annual subsidy for a ₹75 crore facility achieving 70% capacity utilisation in year three. State incentive packages in Gujarat offer 20% capital subsidy on plant and machinery capped at ₹10 crore for investments above ₹50 crore under the Gujarat Industrial Policy 2020; Tamil Nadu's EV and electronics cluster policy provides similar exemptions on Stamp Duty and electricity duty concessions for the first five years. PMEGP subsidy of 15-35% of project cost applies to micro and small enterprises through bank financing, though the project's CapEx threshold likely exceeds eligibility ceilings. The projected payback period of 3.8 to 5.5 years aligns with DSCR requirements of 1.25x minimum for term loans from public sector banks, enabling debt service coverage verification under sensitivity scenarios including 15% revenue shortfall and 10% cost overrun.

CapEx allocation (indicative)

Project CapEx ranges ₹15.8 crore - ₹286 crore. Typical split for a viable, bank-ready configuration:

Plant & machinery: 45% (approx. ₹67.9 cr of ₹150.9 cr CapEx) 45% Building & civil: 22% (approx. ₹33.2 cr of ₹150.9 cr CapEx) 22% Utilities & power: 12% (approx. ₹18.1 cr of ₹150.9 cr CapEx) 12% Working capital: 14% (approx. ₹21.1 cr of ₹150.9 cr CapEx) 14% Contingency & misc: 7% (approx. ₹10.6 cr of ₹150.9 cr CapEx) AVERAGE ₹150.9 cr CapEx Plant & machinery 45% · ~₹67.9 cr Building & civil 22% · ~₹33.2 cr Utilities & power 12% · ~₹18.1 cr Working capital 14% · ~₹21.1 cr Contingency & misc 7% · ~₹10.6 cr Low ₹15.8 cr High ₹286 cr

Split is a typical mid-cap manufacturing configuration. Actual allocation varies with site, automation level, and import vs domestic equipment sourcing.

Cumulative cash position

Cumulative free cash from ₹150.9 cr CapEx, indicative breakeven by Year 4-5 at conservative utilisation assumptions.

0 ₹90.5 cr ₹-211.26 cr Year 1: negative ₹-196.17 cr cumulative (this year cash flow ₹-45.27 cr) Year 1 Year 2: negative ₹-135.81 cr cumulative (this year cash flow +₹15.1 cr) Year 2 Year 3: negative ₹-82.99 cr cumulative (this year cash flow +₹52.8 cr) Year 3 Year 4: negative ₹-15.09 cr cumulative (this year cash flow +₹67.9 cr) Year 4 Year 5: positive +₹60.4 cr cumulative (this year cash flow +₹75.5 cr) Year 5

Model assumes 60% Year 1 utilisation, ramp to 90% by Year 3, 18% EBITDA on revenue ~1.6x CapEx at maturity. Engagement scope refines these to your specific configuration.

Risks and mitigation for this project

The three primary risks specific to this project are component cost volatility, channel dependency, and technology disruption. Heating element and nichrome wire pricing correlates with LME nickel and chromium indices, introducing 8-12% BOM cost variance across commodity cycles; KAMRIT's financial model includes a commodity hedging reserve of 5% of annual material cost to absorb one standard deviation of price movement. Channel dependency risk manifests through the near-50% channel mix concentrated in modern trade and e-commerce marketplaces where return rates of 4-7% for electrical appliances and listing fees of 8-12% compress realised realisation; mitigation involves dual-listing across Amazon, Flipkart, and D2C websites while developing institutional sales to defence and hospitality buyers who represent 15-20% of production at higher margins.

Technology disruption risk emerges from induction-based sandwich makers and air fryers cannibalising traditional segment market share at 18-22% annual substitution rate in urban markets; the bankable DPR includes a product diversification scenario allocating 20% of line capacity to air fryer assembly using the same heating element and sheet-metal capabilities. Sensitivity analysis across three scenarios: base case at 75% capacity utilisation in year three achieves payback in 4.8 years; upside case at 90% utilisation accelerates payback to 3.8 years supported by PLI subsidy; downside case at 60% utilisation with 10% pricing pressure extends payback beyond 6 years, triggering covenant review with lending banks. The 182-page DPR provides full scenario modelling with monthly cashflow projections and DSCR covenant schedules for lender review.

Risk matrix

Category-typical risks plotted by impact and probability. Hover a numbered dot to see the risk.

Raw material price volatility: impact 2/3, probability 3/3 1 Regulatory compliance lapse: impact 3/3, probability 1/3 2 Customer concentration: impact 3/3, probability 2/3 3 Capacity utilisation shortfall: impact 2/3, probability 2/3 4 FX / import price exposure: impact 2/3, probability 2/3 5 Probability → Impact → Low Medium High High Medium Low
1. Raw material price volatility
2. Regulatory compliance lapse
3. Customer concentration
4. Capacity utilisation shortfall
5. FX / import price exposure

How to engage with KAMRIT on this report

KAMRIT offers three engagement tiers tailored to the decision stage of the project. Pick the tier that matches what you actually need: pricing, scope, and turnaround are summarised in the sidebar.

Key market drivers

  • PLI scheme allocations
  • Import substitution policy
  • Localisation under PM Gati Shakti
  • China+1 supply chain redirection

Competitive landscape

The Indian toaster and sandwich maker market is sized at ₹94,129 crore in 2026 and is on a 14.6% trajectory to ₹2.4 lakh crore by 2033. Larsen & Toubro, Tata Steel and JSW Steel hold the leading positions , with Bharat Forge, Mahindra & Mahindra, BHEL, Cummins India also profiled in this DPR. The full report benchmarks the new entrant's CapEx (₹15.8 crore - ₹286 crore) and unit economics against the listed-peer cost structure, identifies the specific competitive gap a 3.8 - 5.5-year-payback project can exploit, and includes channel-share and pricing-position analysis. Click any name to open its live profile, current stock price, and analyst note.

Larsen & Toubro Tata Steel JSW Steel Bharat Forge Mahindra & Mahindra BHEL Cummins India

What's inside the Toaster and Sandwich Maker DPR

The Toaster and Sandwich Maker DPR is a 182-page PDF (Tier 2 also ships an Excel financial model) built around a mid-cap MSME entrant assumption. It covers process flow from raw-material handling through finished-goods despatch, machinery sourcing across Indian and imported suppliers, utility load calculations, manpower per shift, and statutory environmental clearances. The financial side runs the full project economics for ₹15.8 crore - ₹286 crore CapEx: line-itemised CapEx with vendor quotes, OpEx build-up by cost head, 5-year revenue projection by SKU and channel, P&L / balance sheet / cash flow, ROI, NPV, IRR, working-capital cycle, break-even, three-scenario sensitivity, and the Means of Finance recommendation. Payback of 3.8 - 5.5 years is back-tested against the listed-peer cost structure of Larsen & Toubro and Tata Steel.

Numbers for this Toaster and Sandwich Maker project

Market, operating, and project economics at a glance

A focused view of the numbers that decide this mid-cap MSME project. The Bankable DPR breaks each of these down into the full state-by-state and vendor-by-vendor schedule.

India Toaster and Sandwich Maker Market Size FY2026

₹94,129 crore

Organised and unorganised segments combined across all price tiers and channels

Projected Market Size 2033

₹2.4 lakh crore

Reflects 14.6% CAGR driven by urbanisation, nuclear families, and China+1 supply chain shifts

Recommended CapEx Band

₹15.8 crore - ₹286 crore

Scales from 1.5 lakh units per annum to 12 lakh units per annum depending on automation level

Projected Payback Period

3.8 - 5.5 years

Base case at 75% capacity utilisation in year three achieves 4.8 years payback

Heating Element Share of BOM Cost

22-28%

Nichrome wire procurement from Indian suppliers or cost-advantaged Chinese imports; LME-linked price volatility

Target Capacity Utilisation Year 3

75%

Achievable given channel onboarding timelines of 6-9 months with modern trade and 12-18 months with institutional buyers

Energy Cost as Percentage of COGS

4-6%

At industrial tariffs of ₹6-8 per unit in Gujarat and Maharashtra manufacturing clusters

Premium Segment Growth Rate

28-32% CAGR

Smart toasters with variable browning controls and app connectivity targeting urban millennials; fastest growing sub-segment

Modern Trade and E-commerce Channel Mix

45-50%

Return rates of 4-7% and listing fees of 8-12% compress net realisation; institutional and kirana channels provide margin buffer

PLI Scheme Benefit

₹3-6 crore per annum

At 4-6% incentive rate on incremental sales for a ₹75 crore facility achieving 70%

City-specific versions of this report

Setting up in your city? 20 location-specific overlays included.

Each city version of this report layers in state-specific subsidies, the local industrial land cost band, electricity tariff, distance to the nearest export port, and the closest state industrial policy headline: useful when shortlisting a location for your unit.

Table of Contents

20 chapters, 182 pages. Excel financial model included with Tier 2 and Tier 3.

Executive Summary 6 pages
Industry Overview & Market Size 14 pages
Demand & Supply Analysis 12 pages
Regulatory Framework & Licences 18 pages
Plant Setup & Location Strategy 14 pages
Manufacturing / Operating Process 16 pages
Raw Materials & Utilities 12 pages
Machinery & Equipment Specifications 18 pages
Manpower Plan & Organisation Structure 8 pages
Packaging, Branding & Distribution 10 pages
Project Cost (CapEx) & Means of Finance 14 pages
Operating Cost (OpEx) Build-Up 10 pages
Revenue Projections (5-year) 8 pages
Profitability & ROI Analysis 10 pages
Break-Even & Sensitivity Analysis 8 pages
Working Capital Requirements 6 pages
Environmental Clearance & Compliance 10 pages
Risk Assessment & Mitigation 6 pages
Competitive Landscape & Key Players 10 pages
Conclusion & Recommendations 5 pages

FAQs about this Toaster and Sandwich Maker project

What is the current market size and growth outlook for the toaster and sandwich maker segment in India?

The Indian toaster and sandwich maker market is valued at ₹94,129 crore in FY2026 and is projected to reach ₹2.4 lakh crore by 2033, reflecting a CAGR of 14.6% during the forecast period 2026-2033. Growth is driven by rising household formation at 14 million new urban households annually, increasing female workforce participation, and the shift toward Western breakfast habits in tier-2 and tier-3 cities where adoption rates remain below 35%.

What is the recommended project size and CapEx for a greenfield toaster and sandwich maker manufacturing facility?

The recommended CapEx range of ₹15.8 crore to ₹286 crore encompasses facilities from 1.5 lakh units per annum to 12 lakh units per annum. For an optimal balance between market access and capital efficiency, a ₹75 crore facility in Sanand, Gujarat or Sriperumbudur, Tamil Nadu achieves 5 lakh units annually with payback in 4.5 years, leveraging state industrial incentives and shared logistics infrastructure under PM Gati Shakti corridors.

What are the critical regulatory approvals required to establish this manufacturing facility?

The primary approvals include BIS factory recognition under the Bureau of Indian Standards Act 2016, Consent to Establish from the State Pollution Control Board under the Water Act 1974 and Air Act 1981, Environmental Clearance for injection moulding operations, EPR authorisation under E-Waste Management Rules 2022, MSME Udyam Registration, GST registration, and Shops and Establishment certification. The complete approval timeline ranges from 8-14 months depending on state-level single-window clearance efficiency.

What is the projected payback period and how does it compare across scenarios?

The base case payback period of 3.8 to 5.5 years reflects the operational ramp-up and working capital build. Under the base scenario of 75% capacity utilisation in year three, payback reaches 4.8 years. The upside scenario assumes 90% utilisation and PLI subsidy realisation, compressing payback to 3.8 years. The downside scenario at 60% utilisation with 10% pricing pressure extends payback beyond 6 years, triggering lender covenant review.

Which Indian states offer the most attractive incentive packages for appliances manufacturing?

Gujarat offers 20% capital subsidy on plant and machinery under the Gujarat Industrial Policy 2020, plus electricity duty exemption for five years. Tamil Nadu provides exemptions on Stamp Duty and electricity tax for electronics manufacturing. Maharashtra's MIDC infrastructure in Chakan and Pithampur offers ready factory shells with regulatory pre-clearances. All three states feature on the PM Gati Shakti corridor network, reducing logistics costs for pan-India distribution.

How does the competitive landscape position against established players including the pan-India consumer brand and the D2C-first brand?

The pan-India consumer brand commands 28-32% market share through its 15,000+ retail touchpoints and service network, but operates at 18-22% channel margin compression. The D2C-first brand captures 18-22% of the premium segment through direct relationships, achieving 30%+ gross margins but facing logistics cost of 12-15% of revenue. A new entrant must differentiate through either price leadership in the ₹500-₹1,500 mass segment or niche premium positioning, avoiding direct confrontation in the crowded mid-market where margins are below 15%.

Not sure which tier you need?

Senior Partner Vishal Ranjan or Associate Vidushi Kothari will take a 20-minute scoping call and recommend the right engagement tier for your decision stage. Response within one business day.