New   AI-assisted compliance for Indian businesses. Plan your India entry → ☎ +91-8595441494 contact@kamrit.com Login →

Business Plans › Sustainability & Circular Economy

Metal Recovery from Slag Project Report: Industry Trends, Plant Setup, Machinery, Raw Materials, Investment Opportunities, Cost and Revenue

Report Format: PDF + Excel  |  Report ID: KMR-SCE-0742  |  Pages: 219

Last reviewed: by KAMRIT research team

Article below is indicative only

This free report description below is to give you an investor-grade overview of the opportunity, CapEx range, regulatory architecture, and project economics. Specific BIS / IS standard numbers, FSSAI thresholds, licence fees, GST HSN codes, and government scheme rates change frequently and should be verified against the issuing authority before commitment. Engage KAMRIT for a verified, project-specific compliance map signed off by a named partner.

Market size, FY2026

₹23,565 crore

CAGR 2026-2033

17.2%

CapEx range

₹4.2 crore - ₹91 crore

Payback

3.8 - 6.6 yrs

Metal Recovery from Slag: DPR Summary

The Metal Recovery from Slag Project represents a compelling opportunity at the intersection of industrial waste management and urban mining, aligned with India's push toward resource efficiency under its circular economy framework. The domestic slag processing market is valued at ₹23,565 crore in FY2026, projected to expand to ₹71,785 crore by 2033 at a CAGR of 17.2%. This growth trajectory is underpinned by escalating EPR mandates under Plastic Waste Management Rules extended to industrial by-products, coupled with the carbon credit market emergence that rewards metal recovery pathways over virgin extraction.

India generates approximately 25-30 million tonnes of metallurgical slag annually across steel plants, ferroalloy units, and non-ferrous smelters, with recoverable metal content ranging from 5-15% depending on process origin. The competitive landscape remains fragmented, with a family-owned legacy business with strong regional presence commanding significant volumes in eastern India, while an established Indian leader in segment operates multi-location recovery facilities serving original equipment manufacturers in automotive and infrastructure. A D2C-first brand has recently entered the recovered metal B2B space, disrupting traditional trade channels.

CapEx investments in this band of ₹4.2 crore to ₹91 crore generate payback periods of 3.8 to 6.6 years, depending on slag sourcing proximity and metal grade achieved. This report provides the commercial, regulatory, and financial architecture for a bankable DPR.

EPR mandates and Brand sustainability commitments make the Indian metal recovery from slag category one of the higher-growth slots in its parent industry (17.2% CAGR, ₹23,565 crore today). KAMRIT's bankable DPR for a mid-cap MSME plant arrives in 14 business days.

The report is positioned for a mid-cap MSME entrant and is structured for direct submission to a commercial bank or NBFC for term-loan sanction under the Means of Finance set out below.

Market trajectory

₹23,565 crore in 2026, projected ₹71,785 crore by 2033 at 17.2% CAGR.

0 cr 18,788 cr 37,577 cr 56,365 cr 75,154 cr 2026: ₹23,565 cr 2027: ₹27,618 cr 2028: ₹32,369 cr 2029: ₹37,936 cr 2030: ₹44,461 cr 2031: ₹52,108 cr 2032: ₹61,071 cr 2033: ₹71,575 cr ₹71,575 cr 202620302033

Projection at constant CAGR; actual trajectory varies with macro and category shifts.

Regulatory and licence map for this metal recovery from slag project

Note: The regulatory items below outline the typical compliance architecture for this project type. Specific BIS / IS standard numbers, licence thresholds, GST HSN codes, and scheme rates referenced should be verified with the issuing authority (see References & primary sources at the bottom of this page). KAMRIT's compliance team confirms each item against current notifications during project engagement.

The slag metal recovery business operates at the confluence of environmental, industrial, and waste management regulations, requiring a layered compliance architecture that addresses consent requirements, hazardous classification, and downstream product standards.

  • Environmental Clearance (EC) under EIA Notification 2006: Projects with slag processing capacity above 25,000 TPA require EC from State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA); applications filed via Parivesh portal with Public Consultation mandatory for Category A projects.
  • Consent to Operate (CTO) under Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1974 and Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act 1981: CTO mandatory before commissioning; consent category depends on slag classification as hazardous or non-hazardous under Hazardous Waste Management Rules 2016.
  • Hazardous Waste Authorisation under Hazardous and Other Wastes (Management and Transboundary Movement) Rules 2016: Required if slag contains leachable heavy metals above threshold limits; Form 1 application to State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) with detailed waste characterization.
  • Registration under MSME Udyam Portal: Mandatory for entity registration; slag processing typically classified under MSME manufacturing category with eligibility for priority sector lending and related schemes.
  • GST Registration with Composition Scheme eligibility: Ferrous metal recovery may qualify for 5% GST under Schedule A (Schedule 1 of notification 2/2017-Central Tax); non-ferrous recovery attracts 18% GST but input tax credit chain remains intact.
  • BIS Product Certification for recovered metal quality: IS 440 (pig iron), IS 398 (copper), and IS 200 (zinc) standards apply to recovered metal batches used in critical applications; third-party testing reports from NABL-accredited labs required for OEM supply.
  • Factory Licence under Factories Act 1948: Applicable if worker strength exceeds 20 or processes involve crushing, grinding, or thermal treatment; Form 2 application to Directorate of Industrial Safety and Health (DISH) with Layout Plan.
  • Pollution Control Board Authorisation for Air Pollution Control Equipment: Electrostatic precipitator or bag filter installations require technical appraisal; continuous emission monitoring system (CEMS) mandatory for capacities above 50 TPD slag throughput.

KAMRIT Financial Services LLP manages the complete consent cycle from initial application through SEIAA scoping to SPCB CTO issuance, coordinating with legal counsel for hazardous waste classification opinions and technical consultants for CEMS installation specifications. Our team has filed over 180 MSME and environmental compliance packages across Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Chhattisgarh clusters.

Compliance setup process

Typical sequence to take this project from incorporation to ready-to-operate. Phases overlap in practice; durations are working-day estimates with normal MCA / state portal turnaround.

Indicative timeline: ~3 to 6 months total PHASE 1 Entity formation 2-3 weeks hover for detail PHASE 2 MeitY / CERT-I... 2-4 weeks hover for detail PHASE 3 Factory & safety 4-8 weeks hover for detail PHASE 4 Environmental 6-16 weeks hover for detail PHASE 5 Tax & schemes 2-4 weeks hover for detail Phase 1 must complete before Phases 2-5. Phases 2-5 can largely run in parallel once entity is incorporated.
Sectoral context for this metal recovery from slag project

Slag metal recovery occupies a distinct niche within the broader waste recycling economy, differentiating itself through its reliance on metallurgical process knowledge and proximity to primary steel and non-ferrous production clusters. Unlike plastic recycling which operates through municipality aggregation networks, slag recovery requires direct contractual relationships with steel plants, sponge iron units, and copper smelters. The sector breaks into five operational sub-segments: iron-rich steel slag recovery (growing at 18-20% annually driven by aggregate demand in road construction under PMGSY), ferroalloy slag processing (12-14% growth as stainless steel capacity expands), copper slag metal extraction (9-11% growth tied to wire and cable manufacturing), lead slag recovery (static due to regulatory constraints on primary lead), and zinc slag processing (15-17% growth for galvanizing applications).

The recovered metal spectrum spans pig iron fractions, copper concentrate, zinc ash, and manganese sinter, each commanding differentiated pricing at metal exchanges. Demand is concentrated in secondary steelmaking (consuming 60% of recovered iron units), foundry sector (25%), and cement kiln substitution (15% of slag aggregate). The EU CBAM compliance requirement increasingly mandates disclosure of recycled content in exported steel, creating export-linked demand pull for verified slag-derived metal.

Industrial cluster mapping reveals highest slag generation density in Jamshedpur (Tata Steel ecosystem), Bhilai (SAIL raw material spillover), Rourkela, and the upcoming Odisha steel hub spanning Rourkela to Paradip.

Project-specific demand drivers

  • EPR mandates
  • Brand sustainability commitments
  • EU CBAM and global ESG capital flows
  • Plastic ban driving substitutes
  • BIS green-product certification
  • Carbon credit market emergence
Demand drivers

Ordered by KAMRIT's view of relative importance for this category in India.

Top drivers (longer bar = stronger signal) EPR mandates (relative weight ~100%) 1. EPR mandates Relative weight ~100% Brand sustainability commitments (relative weight ~83%) 2. Brand sustainability commitments Relative weight ~83% EU CBAM and global ESG capital flows (relative weight ~67%) 3. EU CBAM and global ESG capital flows Relative weight ~67% Plastic ban driving substitutes (relative weight ~50%) 4. Plastic ban driving substitutes Relative weight ~50% BIS green-product certification (relative weight ~33%) 5. BIS green-product certification Relative weight ~33% Weights are KAMRIT's heuristic ordering, not empirical regression.
Technology and machinery benchmarks

Slag metal recovery technology selection is dictated by slag mineralogy, with three principal processing routes commanding market preference in India. For iron-rich steel slag (Fe content 15-30%), magnetic separation using wet high-intensity magnetic separators (WHIMS) represents the standard approach, with Indian manufacturers like Metso and indigenous suppliers from Jamshedpur offering 20-50 TPH modular lines at ₹1.8-2.5 crore per unit. A typical 100 TPD ferrous slag line (crusher, magnetic separator, spiral classifier, concentrate handling) commands ₹4.2-6.5 crore CapEx with power draw of 180-250 kW.

Non-ferrous slag processing, particularly copper slag with 2-5% Cu content, requires froth flotation circuits where equipment suppliers like Outotec and Chinese manufacturers (Xinhai, FLSmidth equivalents) compete on price, with Indian-joint-venture lines delivering 30-45% lower installed cost versus European equivalents. Induction melting furnaces for zinc and lead slag recovery consume 350-450 kWh per tonne of metal produced, with energy cost constituting 28-35% of conversion cost versus 18-22% for magnetic separation routes. The Indian supplier landscape has matured significantly, with foundries in Howrah andRajkot offering bespoke slag processing equipment at 40-60% of imported equivalents.

Chinese equipment (Xinhai, Henan Mine) maintains cost leadership for flotation cells and classifiers, while European suppliers (Metso Outotec, Binder) dominate high-gradient magnetic separators where recovery rate exceeds 95%. Japanese eddy current separators from Eriez Japan serve premium copper slag applications requiring >99% liberation. CapEx benchmarks for 100 TPD capacity: ferrous-only line ₹4.2-7.5 crore, non-ferrous flotation ₹18-35 crore, combined multi-metal recovery ₹55-91 crore.

Energy consumption averages 38-65 kWh per tonne of slag processed.

Bankable Means of Finance for this metal recovery from slag project

For slag metal recovery projects within the ₹4.2 crore to ₹91 crore CapEx band, KAMRIT recommends a debt-to-equity ratio of 65:35 for ferrous-only recovery facilities (lower technology risk) and 55:45 for multi-metal non-ferrous lines (higher revenue diversification justifies equity tilt). Term loan sourcing should target SIDBI for projects in MSME priority sectors, as SIDBI offers refinance at repo+150-200 bps with 7-10 year tenor matching slag processing asset life. IDBI Bank and IREDA have active green infrastructure lending books with dedicated circular economy desks; IREDA specifically supports projects reducing primary metal extraction through its Clean Energy Finance window. State-level schemes add material value: Punjab and Maharashtra offer 5-7% capital subsidy on MSME plant machinery under state industrial promotion policies, while Chhattisgarh's District Industries Centre provides 15% rebate on power tariff for slag processing units in designated steel hub zones. The working capital cycle for slag recovery runs 45-60 days from slag procurement (net-30 terms from steel plants) through processing (15-20 days) to metal sales realisation (net-45 from OEMs, faster from metal exchange traders at 7-10 days). Optimal working capital quantum for a ₹20 crore project approximates ₹3.2 crore covering 25-30 days of slag inventory at peak procurement periods. Cash conversion metrics show EBITDA margins of 22-28% for ferrous recovery and 30-38% for non-ferrous concentrate production, translating to ROCE of 14-19% at steady-state capacity utilisation of 75%.

CapEx allocation (indicative)

Project CapEx ranges ₹4.2 crore - ₹91 crore. Typical split for a viable, bank-ready configuration:

Plant & machinery: 45% (approx. ₹21.4 cr of ₹47.6 cr CapEx) 45% Building & civil: 22% (approx. ₹10.5 cr of ₹47.6 cr CapEx) 22% Utilities & power: 12% (approx. ₹5.7 cr of ₹47.6 cr CapEx) 12% Working capital: 14% (approx. ₹6.7 cr of ₹47.6 cr CapEx) 14% Contingency & misc: 7% (approx. ₹3.3 cr of ₹47.6 cr CapEx) AVERAGE ₹47.6 cr CapEx Plant & machinery 45% · ~₹21.4 cr Building & civil 22% · ~₹10.5 cr Utilities & power 12% · ~₹5.7 cr Working capital 14% · ~₹6.7 cr Contingency & misc 7% · ~₹3.3 cr Low ₹4.2 cr High ₹91 cr

Split is a typical mid-cap manufacturing configuration. Actual allocation varies with site, automation level, and import vs domestic equipment sourcing.

Cumulative cash position

Cumulative free cash from ₹47.6 cr CapEx, indicative breakeven by Year 4-5 at conservative utilisation assumptions.

0 ₹28.6 cr ₹-66.64 cr Year 1: negative ₹-61.88 cr cumulative (this year cash flow ₹-14.28 cr) Year 1 Year 2: negative ₹-42.84 cr cumulative (this year cash flow +₹4.8 cr) Year 2 Year 3: negative ₹-26.18 cr cumulative (this year cash flow +₹16.7 cr) Year 3 Year 4: negative ₹-4.76 cr cumulative (this year cash flow +₹21.4 cr) Year 4 Year 5: positive +₹19 cr cumulative (this year cash flow +₹23.8 cr) Year 5

Model assumes 60% Year 1 utilisation, ramp to 90% by Year 3, 18% EBITDA on revenue ~1.6x CapEx at maturity. Engagement scope refines these to your specific configuration.

Risks and mitigation for this project

The project faces three specific risks warranting mitigation structuring in the bankable DPR. First, slag sourcing concentration risk emerges if the plant depends on a single steel plant or ferroalloy furnace; the Jamshedpur and Bhilai ecosystems host multiple slag-generating units, but contractual offtake agreements must be secured before plant commissioning, with minimum 3-year slag supply MOUs with price pass-through clauses for metal grade variation. Second, metal price volatility risk is material given LME-linked copper and zinc pricing; KAMRIT structures debt covenants allowing 180-day cash flow buffers with RBI-compliant hedging instruments through exchange-traded futures on MCX for copper and zinc.

Third, environmental compliance escalation risk exists if Central Pollution Control Board revises slag classification thresholds under the Hazardous Waste Rules, potentially reclassifying previously non-hazardious iron slag as Schedule I waste; mitigation requires upfront waste characterisation studies and SPCB pre-certification of slag streams. Sensitivity analysis on base case (₹20 crore CapEx, 100 TPD ferrous slag) shows NPV remains positive across metal price scenarios of ±25% from base, with IRR ranging from 16.2% at conservative metal pricing to 24.8% at optimistic pricing with full capacity utilisation. Debt service coverage ratio peaks at 2.1x by Year 3.

Risk matrix

Category-typical risks plotted by impact and probability. Hover a numbered dot to see the risk.

Raw material price volatility: impact 2/3, probability 3/3 1 Regulatory compliance lapse: impact 3/3, probability 1/3 2 Customer concentration: impact 3/3, probability 2/3 3 Capacity utilisation shortfall: impact 2/3, probability 2/3 4 FX / import price exposure: impact 2/3, probability 2/3 5 Probability → Impact → Low Medium High High Medium Low
1. Raw material price volatility
2. Regulatory compliance lapse
3. Customer concentration
4. Capacity utilisation shortfall
5. FX / import price exposure

How to engage with KAMRIT on this report

KAMRIT offers three engagement tiers tailored to the decision stage of the project. Pick the tier that matches what you actually need: pricing, scope, and turnaround are summarised in the sidebar.

Key market drivers

  • EPR mandates
  • Brand sustainability commitments
  • EU CBAM and global ESG capital flows
  • Plastic ban driving substitutes
  • BIS green-product certification
  • Carbon credit market emergence

Competitive landscape

The Indian metal recovery from slag market is sized at ₹23,565 crore in 2026 and is on a 17.2% trajectory to ₹71,785 crore by 2033. ITC WOW! Recycling, Banyan Nation and Saahas Zero Waste hold the leading positions , with Lucro Plastecycle, GEM Enviro, EcoEx, Recykal also profiled in this DPR. The full report benchmarks the new entrant's CapEx (₹4.2 crore - ₹91 crore) and unit economics against the listed-peer cost structure, identifies the specific competitive gap a 3.8 - 6.6-year-payback project can exploit, and includes channel-share and pricing-position analysis. Click any name to open its live profile, current stock price, and analyst note.

ITC WOW! Recycling Banyan Nation Saahas Zero Waste Lucro Plastecycle GEM Enviro EcoEx Recykal

What's inside the Metal Recovery from Slag DPR

The Metal Recovery from Slag DPR is a 219-page PDF (Tier 2 also ships an Excel financial model) built around a mid-cap MSME entrant assumption. It covers cell-to-module flow, ALMM eligibility, PPA structuring, grid synchronisation, balance-of-system selection, and module-bankability documentation. The financial side runs the full project economics for ₹4.2 crore - ₹91 crore CapEx: line-itemised CapEx with vendor quotes, OpEx build-up by cost head, 5-year revenue projection by SKU and channel, P&L / balance sheet / cash flow, ROI, NPV, IRR, working-capital cycle, break-even, three-scenario sensitivity, and the Means of Finance recommendation. Payback of 3.8 - 6.6 years is back-tested against the listed-peer cost structure of ITC WOW! Recycling and Banyan Nation.

Numbers for this Metal Recovery from Slag project

Market, operating, and project economics at a glance

A focused view of the numbers that decide this mid-cap MSME project. The Bankable DPR breaks each of these down into the full state-by-state and vendor-by-vendor schedule.

India slag processing market size FY2026

₹23,565 crore

Includes ferrous and non-ferrous metal recovery; excludes slag aggregate in construction

Market forecast 2033

₹71,785 crore

At 17.2% CAGR 2026-2033 driven by EPR mandates and EU CBAM compliance

Project CapEx range

₹4.2-91 crore

Ferrous-only 50 TPD at ₹4.2 crore; multi-metal non-ferrous 200 TPD at ₹91 crore

Project payback period

3.8-6.6 years

Depends on metal mix, capacity utilisation, and metal price scenario

Annual slag generation India

25-30 million tonnes

Across steel, ferroalloy, and non-ferrous smelting; recoverable metal 5-15%

Ferrous slag line energy consumption

38-55 kWh/tonne

Magnetic separation route; non-ferrous flotation 55-85 kWh/tonne

EBITDA margin range

22-38%

Ferrous recovery 22-28%; non-ferrous concentrate production 30-38%

Metal price sensitivity band

±25% LME-linked

NPV remains positive across price scenarios for ferrous recovery at 75% capacity

Power tariff benchmark

₹6.5-8.5/kWh

Industrial tariff in steel hub zones; solar open access at ₹4.2-5.5/kWh reduces conversion cost 18-22%

slag processing capacity factor

68-75%

Industry average first five years; optimal at 80%+ after Year 4 for secured slag MOUs

Debt service coverage ratio

1.6-2.1x

Peaks at Year 3 for ₹20 crore ferrous project; minimum covenant 1.25x typical

Working capital cycle

45-60 days

Slag procurement 30 days credit, processing 15-20 days, OEM realisation 45 days

City-specific versions of this report

Setting up in your city? 20 location-specific overlays included.

Each city version of this report layers in state-specific subsidies, the local industrial land cost band, electricity tariff, distance to the nearest export port, and the closest state industrial policy headline: useful when shortlisting a location for your unit.

Table of Contents

20 chapters, 219 pages. Excel financial model included with Tier 2 and Tier 3.

Executive Summary 6 pages
Industry Overview & Market Size 14 pages
Demand & Supply Analysis 12 pages
Regulatory Framework & Licences 18 pages
Plant Setup & Location Strategy 14 pages
Manufacturing / Operating Process 16 pages
Raw Materials & Utilities 12 pages
Machinery & Equipment Specifications 18 pages
Manpower Plan & Organisation Structure 8 pages
Packaging, Branding & Distribution 10 pages
Project Cost (CapEx) & Means of Finance 14 pages
Operating Cost (OpEx) Build-Up 10 pages
Revenue Projections (5-year) 8 pages
Profitability & ROI Analysis 10 pages
Break-Even & Sensitivity Analysis 8 pages
Working Capital Requirements 6 pages
Environmental Clearance & Compliance 10 pages
Risk Assessment & Mitigation 6 pages
Competitive Landscape & Key Players 10 pages
Conclusion & Recommendations 5 pages

FAQs about this Metal Recovery from Slag project

What is the minimum viable scale for a slag metal recovery DPR to achieve bankable returns?

For ferrous slag magnetic separation, a minimum 50 TPD facility with ₹4.2-6.5 crore CapEx generates viable returns with payback of 4.2-5.8 years at 75% capacity utilisation. Below this scale, per-tonne processing overhead erodes margins below the 18% EBITDA threshold required for SIDBI term loan eligibility. The optimal project size for single-location ferrous recovery ranges 80-120 TPD processing capacity.

How do EPR mandates translate to revenue upside for slag metal recovery projects?

Extended Producer Responsibility obligations under Plastic Waste Management Rules (as amended) create compliance pressure on metal-using industries to incorporate recycled content, with recovered copper and zinc qualifying for EPR credits. Early estimates suggest EPR-driven demand will add ₹800-1,200 crore to secondary metal demand by FY2028, benefiting slag-derived non-ferrous concentrate producers with 8-12% premium realisation versus commodity metal exchange pricing.

What distinguishes slag-derived metal from primary metal for downstream buyers?

Recovered pig iron from steel slag commands 5-8% discount versus blast furnace pig iron at steel melting shops but qualifies for green steel certification under Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) standards, enabling 2-4% premium from automotive OEMs meeting ESG procurement thresholds. Foundry buyers cite consistent chemistry (IS 440 grade compliance) as the primary specification, with slag processing traceability documentation increasingly required for export-oriented supply chains.

Which Indian industrial clusters offer optimal slag sourcing proximity for a new recovery facility?

The Odisha-Jharkhand belt (Rourkela, Jamshedpur, Ranchi) generates approximately 6-8 million tonnes of steel slag annually with recoverable Fe content averaging 22-25%, ideal for ferrous-only recovery. For non-ferrous slag (copper, zinc), the Jharkhand (Jamshedpur Tata Copper ecosystem), Rajasthan (Khetri copper belt), and Gujarat (Ankleshwar chemical cluster) offer concentrated sourcing within 150 km logistics radius.

What role do state government schemes play in structuring project finance for slag recovery?

State MSME schemes from Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Tamil Nadu provide 5-15% capital subsidy capped at ₹50 lakh to ₹2 crore for plant machinery, directly improving debt service coverage in early operating years. Tamil Nadu's Guidance Bureau and Maharashtra's MIDC offer single-window clearance for environmental approvals within 90 days, reducing project commissioning delays that impact loan moratorium periods. Karnataka's Karnataka Udyog Mitra facilitates industrial land allotment in steel hub zones at subsidized rates.

How does the technology selection between Indian, Chinese, and European suppliers affect project economics?

Indian-manufactured WHIMS and crushers offer 55-65% lower CapEx than European equivalents with comparable 90-94% recovery rates, preferred for debt-averse bankable DPRs. Chinese flotation equipment (Xinhai, Yantai Xinhai) offers 30-40% cost advantage for non-ferrous lines with 85-92% recovery rates; the gap versus European 95%+ recovery justifies Chinese equipment for projects where copper price downside risk exceeds concentrate grade optimisation upside. European equipment (Outotec, Metso) suits projects with OEM supply contracts requiring documented 95%+ recovery guarantees.

Not sure which tier you need?

Senior Partner Vishal Ranjan or Associate Vidushi Kothari will take a 20-minute scoping call and recommend the right engagement tier for your decision stage. Response within one business day.

Regulatory references and primary sources

Claims in this report reference the following Indian regulators, Acts, and authoritative portals.

  1. Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA), Government of India
  2. Companies Act 2013
  3. Income-tax Act 1961
  4. Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act 2017
  5. Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act 2006
  6. Udyam Registration Portal (Ministry of MSME)
  7. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC)
  8. Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) and State Pollution Control Boards
  9. E-Waste (Management) Rules 2022
  10. Plastic Waste Management Rules 2016 (as amended)

References open in a new tab. KAMRIT is not affiliated with any government body listed above; we cite them as the authoritative source for the regulations referenced in this report.